A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Londoño Acosta
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por extemporánea
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-477/14.
El peticionario argumentó la violación del derecho al debido proceso, como consecuencia de la falta de vinculación de terceros con interés legítimo, tanto en el trámite de primera y segunda instancia, así como en sede de revisión.
Luego de verificar que el incidente de nulidad fue propuesto de manera extemporánea, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZARLO.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por extemporanea la solicitud de nulidad formulada por Carlos Arturo Londono Acosta, contra la sentencia T-477 de 2014 proferida por la Sala Octava de Revision.
- SEGUNDO. ADVERTIR al solicitante que contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.